Privatization Hurts Everyone

25 Aug

Well… almost everyone.  It certainly doesn’t hurt the private company or corporation that gets the juicy government contracts but in the long run it sure as hell hurts everyone else.  I’ve got two words that should stop a privatization advocate dead in his tracks… Walter Reed.  I say should stop one in his tracks.  Unfortunately, the attention span of your average conservative voter has been shrunken to the point of nonexistence these days by the constant barrage of propaganda roaring at him from all directions as the corporate noise machine unleashes its full fury going into election season.  So now a conversation between me and a guy we’ll just call T.P. Jones (T.P. standing for Tea Party) who thinks we ought to outsource all government functions kind of looks like:

TP:  Private enterprise can do anything more cheaply and efficiently than government can.

ME:  Walter Reed.

TP: Huh?

Now at this point you’re faced with having to explain the Walter Reed, KBR, Halliburton, Arlington and numerous other privatization debacles to this guy in words of not more than two syllables in a Facebook status comment or simply giving up on the whole thing and leaving him to simmer in his own delusional juices.  Believe me, the second choice will save you a lot of wear and tear on your own brain cells, but let’s say you decide to explain to this guy and you go to all the sources for pertinent data and you put together this well thought out, properly sourced document with links to all of the information contained therein and present it to him with an offer to explain anything he doesn’t understand… and you know what happens then?

TP:  I don’t care about all that crap.  Private enterprise can do anything more cheaply and efficiently than government can.

You cannot teach a person who does not want to learn any more than you can depend on facts to carry your argument when the person your arguing with doesn’t want to be bothered with facts.  A closed mind is a closed mind and a wantonly closed mind will never be anything else.  But here’s what the guy above is missing:

According to Paul Buchheit at Common Dreams there are Five Ways Privatization Degrades America .  I’m sure that with just a few quick glances at some stats and at least a fourth grade reading comprehension level we could probably come up with a lot more than five but let’s just go with five MAJOR ways privatization degrades our fair republic,

1. We spend lifetimes developing community assets, then give them away to a corporation for lifetimes to come.
The infrastructure in our cities has been built up over many years with the sweat and planning of farsighted citizens. Yet the dropoff in tax revenues has prompted careless decisions to balance budgets with big giveaways of public assets that should belong to our children and grandchildren.
In Chicago, the Skyway tollroad was leased to a private company for 99 years, and, in a deal growing in infamy, the management of parking meters was sold to a Morgan Stanley group for 75 years. The proceeds have largely been spent.
The parking meter selloff led to a massive rate increase, while hurting small businesses whose potential customers are unwilling to pay the parking fees. Meanwhile, it has been estimated that the business partnership will make a profit of 80 cents per dollar of revenue, a profit margin larger than that of any of the top 100 companies in the nation.

See more examples at the link.  While the emphasis here is that public entities are selling off assets that belong to the people… often against the express wishes of the people… for a short term gain in revenues, there is also the theme that will be evident in all of these examples and the others available at the link, that being that privatization almost always results in a degradation of whatever goods/services that have been turned over to private interests and an increased cost to the consumer/taxpayer.

2. Insanity is repeating the same mistake over and over and expecting different results.
Numerous examples of failed or ineffective privatization schemes show us that hasty, unregulated initiatives simply don’t work.
A Stanford University study “reveals in unmistakable terms that, in the aggregate, charter students are not faring as well as their traditional public school counterparts.” A Department of Education study found that “On average, charter middle schools that hold lotteries are neither more nor less successful than traditional public schools in improving student achievement, behavior, and school progress.”
Our private health care system has failed us. We have by far the most expensive system in the developed world. The cost of common surgeries is anywhere from three to ten times higher in the U.S. than in Great Britain, Canada, France, or Germany.
Studies show that private prisons perform poorly in numerous ways: prevention of intra-prison violence, jail conditions, rehabilitation efforts. The U.S. Department of Justice offered this appraisal: “There is no evidence showing that private prisons will have a dramatic impact on how prisons operate. The promises of 20-percent savings in operational costs have simply not materialized.”
A 2009 analysis of water and sewer utilities by Food and Water Watch found that private companies charge up to 80 percent more for water and 100 percent more for sewer services. Various privatization abuses or failures occurred in California, Georgia, Illinois, Indiana, New Jersey, and Rhode Island.
California’s experiments with roadway privatization resulted in cost overruns, public outrage, and a bankruptcy; equally disastrous was the state’s foray into electric power privatization.

Again there are more examples at the link.  The upshot of this segment is that no matter how many times you demonstrate that privatization is a failed policy as far as the common citizens are concerned, our leaders at all levels of government just keep on keepin’ on when it comes to contracting out of services that we pay our taxes to receive.  California has carried blithely on with major privatization projects in spite of the the examples cited and it has reached the point at which even out state park system is being proposed for auction to the highest bidder, threatening to turn pristine beaches into little more than cash cow theme parks.

3. Facts about privatization are hidden from the public.
Experience shows that under certain conditions, with sufficient monitoring and competition and regulation, privatization can be effective. But too often vital information is kept from the public. The Illinois Public Interest Research Group noted that Chicago’s parking meter debacle might have been avoided if the city had followed common-sense principles rather than rushing a no-bid contract through the city council.
Studies by both the Congressional Research Service and the Pepperdine Law Review came to the same conclusion: any attempt at privatization must ensure a means of public accountability. Too often this need is ignored.
The Arizona prison system is a prime example. For over 20 years the Department of Corrections avoided cost and quality reviews for its private prisons, then got around the problem by proposing a bill to eliminate the requirement for cost and quality reviews.
In Florida, abuses by the South Florida Preparatory Christian Academy went on for years without regulation or oversight, with hundreds of learning-disabled schoolchildren crammed into strip mall spaces where 20-something ‘teachers’ showed movies to pass the time.
In Philadelphia, an announcement of a $38 million charter school plan in May turned into a $139 million plan by July.
In Michigan, the low-income community of Muskegon Heights became the first American city to surrender its entire school district to a charter school company. Details of the contract with Mosaica were not available to the public for some time after the deal was made. But data from the Michigan Department of Education revealed that Mosaica performed better than only 13% of the schools in the state of Michigan.
Also in Michigan, an investigation of administrative salaries elicited this response from charter contractor National Heritage Academies: “As a private company, NHA does not provide information on salaries for its employees.”
Education writer Danny Weil summarizes the charter school secrecy: “The fact is that most discussions of charters and vouchers are not done through legally mandated public hearings under law, but in back rooms or over expensive dinners, where business elites and Wall Street interests are the shot-callers in a secret parliament of moneyed interests.”
Beyond prisons and schools, how many Americans know about the proposal for the privatization of Amtrak, which would, according to West Virginia Representative Nick Rahall, “cripple Main Street by auctioning off Amtrak’s assets to Wall Street.” Or the proposal to sell off the nation’s air traffic control system? Or the sale of federal land in the west? Or the sale of the nation’s gold reserves, an idea that an Obama administration official referred to as “one level of crazy away from selling Mount Rushmore”?

Left this one intact because those examples bring up a question that I’d like our privatization junkies to answer… candidly for once… that being, “If these privatization schemes are so wonderful and these private companies CAN do the job so much better than the public entities involved, why isn’t there more public discussion and information made available that would allow the people to decide.  Why are most of these contracts being drawn up and awarded virtually behind closed doors? 

And here are some of those facts that old T.P. Jones doesn’t have time to be bothered by:

4. Privatizers have suggested that teachers and union members are communists.
Part of the grand delusion inflicted on American citizens is that public employees and union workers are greedy good-for-nothings, enjoying benefits that average private sector workers are denied. The implication, of course, is that low-wage jobs with meager benefits should be the standard for all wage-earners.
The myth is propagated through right-wing organizations with roots in the John Birch Society, one of whose founding members was Fred Koch, also the founder of Koch Industries. To them, public schools are socialist or communist. Explained Heartland Institute President Joseph Bast with regard to private school vouchers in 1997, “we have come to the conclusion that they are the only way to dismantle the current socialist regime.”
But the facts show, first of all, that government and union workers are not overpaid. According to the Census Bureau, state and local government employees make up 14.5% of the U.S. workforce and receive 14.3% of the total compensation. Union members make up about 12% of the workforce, but their total pay amounts to just 9.5% of adjusted gross income as reported to the IRS.
The facts also strongly suggest that wage stability is fostered by the lower turnover rate and higher incidence of union membership in government. The supportive environment that right-wingers call ‘socialism’ helps to sustain living wages for millions of families. The private sector, on the other hand, is characterized by severe wage inequality. Whereas the average private sector salary is similar to that of a state or local government worker, the MEDIAN U.S. worker salary is almost $14,000 less, at $26,363. While corporate executives and financial workers (about one-half of 1% of the workforce) make multi-million dollar salaries, millions of private company workers toil as food servers, clerks, medical workers, and domestic help at below-average pay.

And yet the answer as far as most of these people are concerned is not to raise private sector median income to that of public employees but to either bring public employees down to their own level or eliminate them altogether.  Since when did the American people become so whipped and cowed that their only solution to a bad situation was not to drag themselves out of it but to drag more people into it with them?  The oligarchy is nothing if not expert at exploiting the petty little jealousies of petty little people, eh?

I have to laugh when someone I know posts one of their little cut and paste jibes against public sector workers and I… having spent 35 years in public safety and therefore BEING one of those workers… call them out on it.  “Oh no, Tom, I didn’t mean YOU!  I meant all those OTHER public sector workers.  I’ve never known you to be ANYTHING but honest and hard working and…”.  Heh!

5. Privatization often creates an “incentive to fail.”
Privatized services are structured for profit rather than for the general good. A by-product of the profit motive is that some people will lose out along the way, and parts of the societal structure will fail in order to benefit investors.
This is evident in the privatized prison system, which relies on a decreasing adherence to the law to ensure its own success. Corrections Corporation of America has offered to run the prison system in any state willing to guarantee that jails stay 90% full. “This is where it gets creepy,” says Business Insider’s Joe Weisenthal, “because as an investor you’re pulling for scenarios where more people are put in jail.”
The incentive to fail was also apparent in road privatization deals in California and Virginia, where ‘non-compete’ clauses prevented local municipalities from repairing any roads that might compete with a privatized tollroad. In Virginia, the tollway manager even demanded reimbursement from the state for excessive carpooling, which would cut into its profits.
The list goes on. The Chicago parking meter deal requires compensation if the city wishes to close a street for a parade. The Indiana tollroad deal demanded reimbursement when the state waived tolls for safety reasons during a flood.
Plans to privatize the Post Office have created a massive incentive to fail through the Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act, which requires the USPS to pre-pay the health care benefits of all employees for the next 75 years, even those who aren’t born yet. This outlandish requirement is causing a well-run public service to default on its loans for the first time.
Also set up to fail are students enrolled in for-profit colleges, which get up to 90 percent of their revenue from U.S. taxpayers. Less incentive remains for the schools after tuition is received, as evidenced by the fact that more than half of the students enrolled in these colleges in 2008-9 left without a degree or diploma.
And then we have our littler students, set up to fail by private school advocates in Wisconsin who argue that a requirement for playgrounds in new elementary schools “significantly limit[s] parent’s educational choice in Milwaukee.”

And on we go.  I’d send old T.P. an invite to come and read this entry but you know what would happen? 

A.  He wouldn’t understand it.

B.  He’d understand it but refuse to believe it.

C.  He’d simply say, “I don’t care about all that crap. Private enterprise can do anything more cheaply and efficiently than government can.”

Knowing T.P. the way I know T.P. I’d bet the farm on the last one.

Leave a comment

Posted by on August 25, 2012 in Uncategorized


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: